George Bush: no escaping torture charges

By Katherine Gallagher (guardian.co.uk):

Sooner or later, Bush will step into a country where he will be prosecuted for authorising the abuses of the ‘war on terror’

‘Damn right’: George Bush told NBC’s Matt Lauer that critics of waterboarding should read his memoirs. Photograph: NBCU photobank/Rex Features

Late last year, former US President George W Bush recounted in his memoir, Decision Points, that when he was asked in 2002 if it was permissible to waterboard a detainee held in secret CIA custody outside the United States, he answered “damn right”. This “decision point” led to the waterboarding of that person 183 times in one month. Others were waterboarded, as well.

Waterboarding is torture. In the past, the US prosecuted and convicted Japanese officials who waterboarded US and allied prisoners. US Attorney General Eric Holder has unequivocally stated that waterboarding is torture.

The United States is under an absolute obligation under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) to investigate, prosecute and punish torturers. And yet, here was the former president of the United States admitting he authorised torture. And nothing.

The raison d’etre of the Convention Against Torture is to eradicate torture. And one of the primary tools for preventing torture is to prosecute and punish those who are found to have tortured. In failing to prosecute – or even investigate – George W Bush following his admission, the United States failed to uphold its obligations under CAT.

George Bush was supposed to travel to Geneva later this week to attend a charity gala. Switzerland is also a signatory to the Convention Against Torture – and, as a party to CAT, has undertaken that it will prosecute or extradite for prosecution anyone present in its territory who it has a reasonable basis for believing has committed torture. As calls for Switzerland to investigate Bush for torture mounted, and news began to spread that complaints would be filed on Monday morning by two people held in US custody during Bush’s years in office and tortured, the announcement came that Bush had cancelled his trip.

Switzerland, at least for the time being, will not be called upon to examine the regime that governed detentions at Guantánamo, the redefinition of torture that allowed for interrogation techniques that could constitute torture, and the use of stress positions, manipulation of food, sleep and temperatures, forced nudity and excessive force against detainees. The Geneva prosecutor will also now not have to comb through the nearly 200-page UN report into global practices in relation to secret detention. This report examined the “black sites” established under Bush to hold detainees in CIA custody and interrogate detainees using so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques”, which have been found to constitute torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

The prosecutor will also now not be confronted with the International Committee of the Red Cross’s stark conclusions about this programme (pdf):

“This regime was clearly designed to undermine human dignity and to create a sense of futility by inducing, in many cases, severe physical and mental pain and suffering, with the aim of obtaining compliance and extracting information, resulting in exhaustion, depersonalisation and dehumanisation.”

George Bush himself would also have been an excellent source of evidence in support of opening an investigation for torture: Bush acknowledged on numerous occasions that he authorised and condoned the waterboarding of detainees held in US custody. In September 2006, Bush told the world that under his leadership and authority, the United States had “changed its policies” and was using an “alternative set of procedures” on persons in secret detention facilities run by the CIA outside the United States – in violation of international law. Bush had authorised the creation of the CIA secret detention programme five years earlier. Bush confirmed that he approved the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques”.

The presentation of this evidence and this case must now wait for another day, and for another country to fill the impunity gap created by the refusal of the US department of justice to open an investigation in George Bush and the torture programme he authorised. There are 147 signatory states to the Convention Against Torture, and each has the obligation to open an investigation – should George Bush decide to travel to one of these countries. Bush, as a former president, enjoys no immunity from prosecution for torture.

The case against Bush for torture will not be taken up in Switzerland this week. But one day, this case will be heard.

Bringing the ‘Bush Six’ to justice

7 Jan 2011

Michael Ratner: If those responsible for the Bush administration’s torture policy will not face charges in the US, then in Spain it must be