The TRUE STORY of the BILDERBERG GROUP and What They May Plan Now

For over 14 years, Daniel Estulin has investigated and researched the Bilderberg Group’s far-reaching influence on business and finance, global politics, war and peace, and control of the world’s resources and its money. His book, “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,” was published in 2005 and is now updated in a new 2009 edition. He states that in 1954, “the most powerful men in the world met for the first time” in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, “debated the future of the world,” and decided to meet annually in secret. They called themselves the Bilderberg Group with a membership representing a who’s who of world power elites, mostly from America, Canada, and Western Europe with familiar names like

US Meddling In, and Information On, China, Hong Kong, Tibet

[The 4th Media editor’s note: The dialogue below was done among three regular participants (XinMing, Allen and Maitreya of ChinesePerspectives@hiddenharmonies.org. The 4th Media believes this informal dialogue a quite helpful reference on the said issues…

US Gov't Lied When It Said It Only Bailed Out Healthy Banks: BUT 12 of the 13 BIG Banks Were Going Bust: Cover Up Truth!

The Government’s Entire Strategy Was to Cover Up the Truth We noted in 2011 that the Geithner, Bernanke and Paulson lied about the health of the big banks in pitching bailouts to Congress and the American people: The big banks were all insolvent during the 1980s. And they all became insolvent again in 2008. See this and this. The bailouts were certainly rammed down our throats under false pretenses. But here’s the more important point. Paulson and Bernanke falsely stated that the big banks receiving Tarp money were healthy, when they were not. They were insolvent. Tim Geithner falsely stated that the banks passed some time of an objective stress test but they did not. They were insolvent.

Foreign Interests Are Real Bushfires: A Tragic Tale of the Australian People (I)

An inconvenient question The question of “who rules Australia?” is always answered with pet ideas and different theories. We can see symbols of power all around us, but the exercise of real power and influence is rarely a public event. Defining and identifying who really rules Australia is like trying to pinpoint where consciousness exists within our brain. It is complex and illusive. We may have some idea about different entities who potentially exercise power, but can’t put any single entity under any precise scrutiny. Besides the formal means of power through authority, ownership and control over regulation, etc., much power is the result of inducement, compromise, promises, flattery, coercion, threats, favors, and even goodwill. Making the situation more complex is that different groups exercise power and influence over different aspects of society.