THE [TERROR] STATE OF ISRAEL AS “CARTOONISHLY EVIL”?

Ron Unz on

Itamar Ben-Gvir, Convicted Terrorist and Current Israeli Minister of National Security

Last week I published an article on the dramatic events in domestic American politics, including President Joseph Biden’s sudden disappearance from the presidential race and the elevation of Vice President Kamala Harris as the candidate in his place. Nothing like this had ever previously happened in American political history and it came only a couple of weeks after a highly-suspicious assassination attempt had nearly killed former President Donald Trump, the opposing Republican candidate.

But although the bulk of my article focused upon those matters, I also included a few paragraphs near the end presenting some shocking new disclosures in the ongoing Israel/Gaza conflict. As I wrote at the time:

Politico is one of America’s leading mainstream media outlets on politics and public affairs and ten days ago it published a very lengthy account by two experienced American surgeons who had visited Gaza to provide medical assistance and were utterly horrified by what they encountered there.

According to Dr. Mark Perlmutter, in just a couple of weeks he saw more carnage inflicted upon civilians than he had in the combined total of his previous thirty years of humanitarian visits to war-zones around the world. In particular, it was obvious that Israeli snipers were deliberately shooting young Palestinian children and toddlers, aiming precision shots at their hearts and at their heads.

Given that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other top Israeli leaders have publicly identified the Palestinians with the tribe of Amalek, whom the Hebrew God has commanded must be exterminated down to the youngest newborn baby, such atrocities may be shocking but are hardly surprising.

Running nearly 5,000 words and profusely illustrated with photographs, the Politico story seems to have broken the cordon of silence maintained in network television and Perlmutter was interviewed for a substantial segment entitled “The Children of Gaza” broadcast on CBS News Sunday Morning, during which he repeated his story:

 

It’s obviously quite disturbing for American doctors to report that Israeli snipers are deliberately executing Palestinian toddlers with shots to the head and the heart, and the slight coverage of these facts in our mainstream media outlets is certainly welcome. But for anyone who had closely followed the Middle East conflict over the decades, these facts were not particularly new.

Even many years ago, Israelis had proudly produced numerous varieties of tee-shirts, which often carried the notorious slogan “One Shot, Two Kills,” glorifying the killing of pregnant women and young children by military snipers. I assume that the sheer volume of these current killings finally led some American media outlets to begin taking notice of this situation.

These stories hardly exhaust the roster of ongoing Israeli war-crimes. Despite the long history of oppression and poverty they have endured, the Palestinians are a highly educated population and over they years they had created an enviable medical infrastructure in their besieged Gaza enclave, with numerous excellent hospitals staffed by well-trained medical professionals.

The Israelis bitterly resented these achievements by a population whom they deeply despised and have now destroyed nearly all those hospitals while blocking any import of new medical supplies.

Moreover, just a couple of days ago, the New York Times carried a story describing the widespread Israeli detention and brutal torture of leading Palestinian surgeons and other medical workers, with many of these civilians soon dying from their ill treatment.

Traditional Judaism includes a notorious Talmudic injunction that Jews should seek to kill “the best of the Gentiles” and since medical doctors constitute an elite of Gazan society, it makes perfect sense that they should be targeted for torture and death.

Indeed, international organizations have reported that some 500 doctors and nurses in Gaza have already been killed, while another 300 are still being held in Israeli prisons.

Although I was pleasantly surprised to see the Times run such a candid piece, the same editors have entirely ignored many others of an even more explosive nature. For example, despite horrific bombardment, famine, and disease, the official Gaza death-toll presented by our mainstream media outlets has remained relatively unchanged in recent months, now set at around 40,000.

But as I pointed out in early May, this is almost certainly an illusion:

During the first month or two of the massive Israeli attack, the Gazan Public Health Ministry had maintained very detailed rosters of the dead, including the names, ages, and ID codes of the victims, and regularly released updates of the total, so those numbers seemed absolutely solid.

But the Israeli assault soon targeted all of Gaza’s government offices and hospitals, and by early December, the Gazan officials responsible for tabulating the dead had themselves been killed or gone missing, so the count naturally tended to stagnate, even as conditions horrifically worsened for the surviving Gazans.

The Lancet is one of the world’s oldest and most prestigious medical journals and just last month it published a short piece concluding that Israel’s ongoing attacks on Gaza and its total destruction of the local infrastructure may be responsible for nearly 200,000 civilian deaths, a figure many times larger than any previous media estimate.

Despite the Lancet‘s considerable international standing, this story received very little attention in the mainstream media.

Highly-visible atrocities over many months led the esteemed jurists of the International Court of Justice to issue a series of near-unanimous rulingsthat Israel appears to be undertaking a campaign of genocide against Gaza’s Palestinians, while the International Criminal Court more recently applied for arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and others on similar grounds.

These international judicial rulings may have set into motion a series of events that further demonstrated the unusual ideological beliefs governing much of the political class of the Jewish State.

With Hamas militants mostly secure in their underground tunnels, almost none of them have been captured, so instead the Israeli military and its frustrated troops have seized and incarcerated many thousands of Gazan civilians, holding them without trial or charges, and often under very brutal conditions.

Indeed, the number of such Palestinians captives has become so enormous that it has severely overburdened the Israeli prison system, prompting National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir to publicly propose last month that the prisoners should simply be shot in the head, thereby freeing up their space for additional waves of new ones.

But with the possibility of international arrest warrants hanging over their heads, top Israeli military leaders apparently sought to deflect those accusations by demonstrating that the Israeli army was willing to police itself and prosecute some of its members engaged in such illegal war-crimes.

There have been widespread reports of the regular rape of Palestinian prisoners, both male and female, and the IDF decided to finally investigate one such case, in which nine of its soldiers allegedly gang-raped a male Palestinian, sodomizing him so brutally that he suffered severe physical injury. The military suspects were ordered held at a couple of army bases pending their interrogation.

However, the notion of Israeli Jews facing punishment for torturing or raping Palestinian prisoners stoked enormous outrage in major portions of the Israeli population. As a result, large, violent mobs stormed the military bases in hopes of freeing those accused soldiers, with the story widely covered in the Israeli mediaand many of the scenes available on social media.

Video Player

According to Friday’s Grayzone podcast by Max Blumenthal, this embarrassing political conflict apparently led Ben-Gvir and other important members of the Israeli government to propose new legislation in parliament intended to head off any similar situations in the future by officially decriminalizing the torture or murder of non-Jews by Jews.

Although such notions may be quite alien to Western societies, they are fully in accord with the fundamental tenets of traditional Judaism, and the proposal seems likely to be enacted into law at some point in the future. One of my articles from 2018 had described these controversial religious doctrines:

If these ritualistic issues constituted the central features of traditional religious Judaism, we might regard it as a rather colorful and eccentric survival of ancient times. But unfortunately, there is also a far darker side, primarily involving the relationship between Jews and non-Jews, with the highly derogatory term goyim frequently used to describe the latter.

To put it bluntly, Jews have divine souls and goyim do not, being merely beasts in the shape of men. Indeed, the primary reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve as the slaves of Jews, with some very high-ranking rabbis occasionally stating this well-known fact. In 2010, Israel’s top Sephardic rabbi used his weekly sermon to declare that the only reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve Jews and do work for them.

The enslavement or extermination of all non-Jews seems an ultimate implied goal of the religion.Jewish lives have infinite value, and non-Jewish ones none at all, which has obvious policy implications. For example, in a published article a prominent Israeli rabbi explained that if a Jew needed a liver, it would be perfectly fine and indeed obligatory to kill an innocent Gentile and take his.

Perhaps we should not be too surprised that today Israel is widely regarded as one of the world centers of organ-trafficking.As a further illustration of the seething hatred traditional Judaism radiates towards all those of a different background, saving the life of a non-Jew is generally considered improper or even prohibited, and taking any such action on the Sabbath would be an absolute violation of religious edict.

Such dogmas are certainly ironic given the widespread presence of Jews in the medical profession during recent centuries, but they came to the fore in Israel when a religiously-minded military doctor took them to heart and his position was supported by the country’s highest religious authorities.

These developments were heavily reported by the Israeli media, but they were carefully excluded from any of our own mainstream outlets, so that few Americans who rely upon our newspapers or electronic broadcast media are probably aware of them.

However, social media is another story entirely, and younger Americans who rely upon those sources of information have been exposed to a great deal of such material, helping to explain the waves of student protests that swept across elite colleges a few months ago until they were harshly suppressed.

Ironically enough, much or most of this controversial content has been produced by Israelis themselves, proudly documenting the severe punishment they are successfully inflicting upon their hated Palestinian foes, but perhaps failing to recognize that the rest of the world may consider these same scenes in a very different light. As I wrote a few months ago:

Indeed, the Israelis continued to generate an avalanche of gripping content for those videos. Mobs of Israeli activists regularly blocked the passage of food-trucks, and within a few weeks, senior UN officials declared that more than a million Gazans were on the verge of a deadly famine. When the desperate, starving Gazans swarmed one of those few food delivery convoys allowed through, the Israeli military shot and killed more than 100 of them in the “Flour Massacre” and this was later repeated.

All these horrific scenes of death and deliberate starvation were broadcast worldwide on social media, with some of the worst examples coming from the accounts of gleeful Israeli soldiers, such as their video of the corpse of a Palestinian child being eaten by a starving dog. Another image showed the remains of a bound Palestinian prisoner who had been crushed flat while still alive by an Israeli tank.

According to a European human rights organization, the Israelis had regularly used bulldozers to bury alive large numbers of Palestinians. UN officials reported finding mass graves near several hospitals, with the victims found bound and stripped, shot execution-style. As Internet provocateur Andrew Anglin has pointed out, the behavior of the Israeli Jews does not seem merely evil but “cartoonishly evil,” with all their blatant crimes seeming to be based upon the script of some over-the-top propaganda-film but instead actually taking place in real life.

I think that Anglin’s characterization has considerable value, with the crimes committed by the Israelis often being so monstrous and so barbaric that Americans and other Westerners find it difficult to accept their reality, much like big lies are less likely to be challenged than small ones.

For example, I suspect that most American Christians are probably convinced that the ongoing conflict in the Holy Land is essentially a struggle between Jews and Muslims, but this is entirely mistaken.

Back in April, Tucker Carlson released a 43 minute interview with a Christian Palestinian pastor in Bethlehem who described the severe oppression that he and his Christian flock suffered at the hands of Israel’s extremist Jewish government and the militant settlers it supported.

Carlson emphasized how strange it seemed that America’s conservative Christian leadership did absolutely nothing for their Christian brethren in the Middle East but instead wholeheartedly supported Israel’s anti-Christian activities with money and political support.

The entire segment is quite powerful and definitely worth watching on Twitter or YouTube, but some of the most telling statements have been extracted and distributed on other Tweets, such as this one:

 

None of this was all that surprising to me since back in 2018 I’d drawn upon the seminal research of Prof. Israel Shahak of Hebrew University to describe the exceptionally strong hostility that traditional Judaism always directed towards its rival Christian faith.

And while religious Judaism has a decidedly negative view towards all non-Jews, Christianity in particular is regarded as a total abomination, which must be wiped from the face of the earth.Whereas pious Muslims consider Jesus as the holy prophet of God and Muhammed’s immediate predecessor, according to the Jewish Talmud, Jesus is perhaps the vilest being who ever lived, condemned to spend eternity in the bottommost pit of Hell, immersed in a boiling vat of excrement.

Religious Jews regard the Muslim Quran as just another book, though a totally mistaken one, but the Christian Bible represents purest evil, and if circumstances permit, burning Bibles is a very praiseworthy act. Pious Jews are also enjoined to always spit three times at any cross or church they encounter, and direct a curse at all Christian cemeteries.

Indeed, many deeply religious Jews utter a prayer each and every day for the immediate extermination of all Christians.

Over the years prominent Israeli rabbis have sometimes publicly debated whether Jewish power has now become sufficiently great that all the Christian churches of Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and other nearby areas can finally be destroyed, and the entire Holy Land completely cleansed of all traces of its Christian contamination.

Some have taken this position, but most have urged prudence, arguing that Jews needed to gain some additional strength before they should take such a risky step.

These days, many tens of millions of zealous Christians and especially Christian Zionists are enthusiastic advocates for Jews, Judaism, and Israel, and I strongly suspect that at least some of that enthusiasm is based upon ignorance.

Although back in the 1970s and 1980s, most Jewish religious leaders doubted that they yet acquired the power to finally eradicate Christianity, the balance of political forces seems to have increasingly shifted in their direction.

In early May I noted that under the guise of combatting antisemitism, clever pro-Israel lobbyists had persuaded Congress to enact legislation that seemed to ban the Christian bible in American society:

Some years ago a former senior AIPAC official once boasted to a friendly journalist that if he wrote anything on a simple napkin, within 24 hours he could get signatures of 70 Senators to endorse it, and the political power of the ADL is equally formidable.

Therefore it was hardly surprising that last week an overwhelming bipartisan 320-91 majority in the House passed a bill broadening the meaning of anti-Zionism and antisemitism in the anti-discrimination policies of the Department of Education by codifying the definitions used in our Civil Rights laws to classify those ideas as discriminatory.

Although I haven’t tried to read the text, the obvious intent is to force colleges to expunge such noxious activities as anti-Israel protests from their campus community or face loss of federal funds. This represents a striking attack against academic freedom as well as America’s traditional freedom of speech and thought, and may also pressure other private organizations to adopt similar policies.

In a particularly ironic twist, the definition of antisemitism used in the bill clearly covers portions of the Christian Bible, so the ignorant and compromised Republican legislators have now wholeheartedly endorsed banning the Bible in a country in which 95% of the population has Christian roots.

This same increasing conflation of antisemitism with anti-Zionism and the growing efforts to suppress both those attitudes in American society has ironic implications, as I had noted back in February:

This is certainly an odd situation, warranting careful analysis and explanation. The word “antisemitism” merely means criticizing or disliking Jews, and in recent years, Israel’s partisans have demanded with some success that the term should be extended to encompass anti-Zionism as well, namely hostility to the Jewish state.

But let us suppose that we concede the latter point and agree with pro-Israel activists that “anti-Zionism” is indeed a form of “antisemitism.”

Over the last few months, the Israeli government has brutally slaughtered tens of thousands of helpless civilians in Gaza, committing the greatest televised massacre in the history of the world, with its top leaders using explicitly genocidal language to describe their plans for the Palestinians.

Indeed, the South African government submitted a 91 page legal brief to the International Court of Justice cataloging those Israeli statements, prompting a near-unanimous ruling by the jurists that millions of Palestinians faced the prospect of genocide at Israeli hands.

These days most Westerners claim to regard genocide in a decidedly negative light. So does this not syllogistically require them to embrace and endorse “antisemitism”? Surely a visitor from Mars would be very puzzled by this strange dilemma and the philosophical and psychological contortions it seems to require.

It is rather surprising that the extremely “politically correct” ruling elites of America and the rest of the Western world are loudly cheering on the racially-exclusivist State of Israel even as it kills enormous numbers of women and children and works very hard to starve to death some two million civilians in its unprecedented genocidal rampage.

After all, the far milder and more circumspect regime of Apartheid South Africa was universally condemned, boycotted, and sanctioned for merely the tiniest sliver of such misdeeds.

The Israel/Gaza conflict has now lasted nearly ten months, producing an absolutely unprecedented amount of global media coverage of the underlying struggle between Zionists and Palestinians, whose roots stretch back for more than a century. As a result, I think that many millions or even tens of millions of Americans have discovered shocking facts that they had never previously suspected.

But as for myself, none of these disturbing developments have been all that surprising or unexpected and to some extent they were almost implicitly suggested in a series of articles that I had published just over six years ago:

In those pieces, I did my best to cautiously draw upon highly reliable sources for my material, but much of it seemed so totally discordant from the narrative presented in my standard history books and media outlets that I sometimes inwardly wondered whether it could possibly be correct.

I’m sure that a very substantial fraction of the hundreds of thousands of other readers had a similar reaction, but in far more extreme form.

However, everything I had suggested now seems to be fully confirmed by the daily reports coming out of Israel and Gaza. As I emphasized in a May article, this may be one of the most important lasting consequences of these current Israeli actions, and perhaps extremely damaging to the future of the Jewish State

The fourth article in that 2018 series ran six years ago Tuesday and it might be especially surprising to many Americans, describing and documenting the strong ties between the Zionist movement led by David Ben-Gurion and Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany.

Not only was the Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s absolutely crucial for the establishment of the State of Israel, but even after war broke out in 1939, a smaller right-wing Zionist faction sought to enlist in Axis Powers as a Nazi military ally.

Yitzhak Shamir who served as Israel’s prime minister for eight years during the 1980s and 1990s had been the leader of that strongly pro-Nazi faction, and indeed according to later claims by Israeli insiders, he retained a seething hatred of the United States during all decades that followed, never forgiving America for having failed to support Hitler during World War II.

Once these surprising facts are fully absorbed and assimilated, other revelations may become much less difficult to accept.

For example, although the horrific Nazi atrocities of eighty years ago are still regularly described on almost a daily basis in the Times and our other mainstream media outlets, as far as I can tell, few if any of them ever actually happened and they were just as fictional as the lurid recent propaganda-hoaxes of Hamas militants beheading or roasting Israeli babies or gang-raping Israeli women.

 

Indeed, I think the best means of understanding the Nazi Holocaust—as well as the more recent claims of horrific Hamas atrocities—is that both may have merely represented extreme examples of Jewish psychological projection:

Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu faces international charges of genocide and has a looming arrest warrant for war-crimes hanging over his head, while also being burdened with dismal poll ratings in his own country.

Nonetheless, he was recently invited to address a joint session of Congress for the fourth time, an unprecedented American honor never previously granted any world leader. His lengthy, bombastic speech was rapturously received, being interrupted by some 58 standing ovations, coming at a rate of more than once each minute.

It was widely believed that a central goal of Netanyahu’s visit was to assure himself of full American military support in the event of an Israeli war with Iran and Hezbollah. He seems to have received those assurances since almost immediately upon his return home, he unleashed an unprecedented series of assassinations seemingly intended to provoke such a wider regional war.

These included an airstrike killing one of Hezbollah’s highest-ranking military officials in Beirut and an explosion that took the life of the top political leader of Hamas while he was in Tehran for the inauguration of Iran’s new president.

These actions were obviously intended to provoke a wider regional war and there was some evidence that the American government may have been aware of them since a flotilla of American warships had already been dispatched to the Middle East in order to provide potential military support to Israel.

The Israeli government has long specialized in assassinations, and these were merely the most recent and important of such deadly attacks. An April article of mine had discussed the previous round of such incidents:

Around the same time, the Israelis used three consecutive drone strikes to kill all the members of a relief convoy of the World Central Kitchen, the organization that the American government had tasked with bringing food supplies into Gaza. The WCK leadership is very close to top figures in the Biden Administration and the convoy had fully coordinated all its movements with the Israeli government, so the latter’s claim of mistaken friendly fire seems highly implausible.

Israel’s government and Israeli activists have been deliberately blocking all food deliveries to Gaza’s starving population of two million and it is widely suspected that the targeted killing of the members of the relief organization closest to the American government was intended to terrorize all other aid groups into abandoning their efforts and leaving the Gazans to their grim fate.

And in perhaps the most shocking incident of all, the Israeli government bombed part of Iran’s Damascus Embassy, killing several high-ranking Iranian generals, a total breach of international law that has no precedent in the last several centuries. Such a blatant Israeli assassination strike against traditionally inviolate diplomatic quarters was an obvious act of war intended to provoke the sort of Iranian retaliation that would draw America into a regional military conflict.

The Iranians have now responded with a large wave of drone and missile attacks, and the next few days may see whether the Israeli gambit succeeds.This pattern of outrageous behavior continued and the following week the Israelis targeted and killed the three adult sons of the top-ranking Hamas leader and former Gazan prime minister with whom they had been negotiating.

Apparently none of the victims were themselves Hamas militants and several grandchildren also died in the attack. A couple of months earlier, the Israelis had previously targeted and assassinated the Hamas official in Beirut who had been their negotiating partner on hostage exchange issues. Around the same time, a very well-connected Israeli journalist revealed that Israel’s airstrikes against suspected Hamas militants relied heavily upon an AI system called “Where’s Daddy?” aimed at striking them at home so that their entire families would also be killed.

The common thread across all of these incidents is Israel’s remarkable indeed overwhelming focus on assassination as its central tool of military conflict or statecraft, coupled with absolutely no respect for normal international law or even basic human decency.

Although these numerous cases might shock many Americans, I was not particularly surprised due to my past reading of the history of such Israeli activities. These had been the subject of an extremely long article that I had written in early 2020.

The fortuitous timing of these latest, very high profile assassinations raises dark suspicions in my mind.

For decades, Netanyahu has unsuccessfully sought to force America into destroying Iran, his most powerful regional rival, and he now obviously believed that a massive provocation aimed at Iran and its Hezbollah ally might finally ignite the war he had long desired.

The attacks on the Hezbollah and Hamas leaders occurred almost simultaneously, with the latter especially intended to humiliate Iran, killing the Hamas political leader in Iran’s capital just hours after he had been warmly embraced by the new Iranian president following the inauguration ceremony.

Thus, the timing of the two killings seems to have been planned and prepared well in advance. Indeed, Israeli intelligence sources claimed that a bomb had been hidden in the tightly-guarded guest house regularly used by the target, then detonated.

Furthermore, this audacious assassination must also greatly raise Iranian suspicions regarding the death of their country’s previous president, who was killed in strange helicopter crash in mid-May, only a few weeks after a back-and-forth exchange of missile strikes between Israel and Iran.

Yet oddly enough, the Israeli government claimed that the Beirut assassination was actually in retaliation for a deadly Hezbollah rocket attack several days earlier had that killed a dozen children and teenagers on a soccer field in Israel’s Golan Heights.

A dozen such Israeli civilian deaths was a huge number, greater than the combined total for all the recent years of cross-border skirmishes with Hezbollah, and the story of so many Israeli youngsters killed playing soccer blanketed the Western media, easily justifying the Israeli assassinations that followed a couple of days later.

So the timing of those civilian deaths, which occurred while Netanyahu was still in the U.S. meeting with top officials was exceptionally beneficial for his political plans and efforts. Hezbollah naturally denied being responsible for the rocket attack, but they were ignored.

However, it soon came out that none of the dead youngsters were Jewish Israelis, but they were instead Druze citizens of Syria, members of a community vehemently hostile to Israel and the illegal Israeli occupation of their lands.

Furthermore, as the Grayzone and others have recounted, local eyewitnesses have reported that the projectile that hit and killed them was not the Hezbollah weapon that the Israeli government had claimed, which anyway could not have reached that far into the Golan Heights, but was instead an Israeli missile.

This has led the Grayzone and many other analysts to conclude that the Druze youngsters had probably been killed by an errant Israeli Iron Dome defensive missile that had failed to properly intercept a Hezbollah rocket.

This account of events is certainly possible, but consider a few extremely suspicious elements:

  • Nothing like this civilian loss of life in Israel had ever previously occurred during all the years of cross-border missile exchanges with Hezbollah.
  • The American media initially portrayed the attack as the brutal slaughter of Jewish Israeli youngsters by a Hezbollah rocket and the deaths were perfectly timed for Netanyahu’s political meetings with American leaders.
  • The deaths then turned out to be Syrian Druze, a group that Israel hates and despises, thus adding just another dozen non-Jewish deaths to the many, many tens of thousands that the Israelis had killed over the last year.
  • Although initially reported as a Hezbollah rocket, the projectile appears to have been an Israeli missile.
  • Israel used the attack to justify its assassination of a top Hezbollah commander, a provocation that occurred almost simultaneously with the long-planned assassination of the Hamas leader in Iran.

I have absolutely no evidence that the Israelis deliberately targeted and killed those Druze youngsters playing soccer in order to strengthen their political negotiations in America and help justify their planned campaign of provocative assassinations aimed at goading both Iran and Hezbollah into a wider war.

But considering their track record over the years, I can’t imagine why they wouldn’t have done such a thing, and with the strong assistance of the pro-Israeli media, it seems to have worked perfectly.

I’m sure that an overwhelming majority of the Americans who heard of those dozen soccer deaths still assume that the victims were Jewish Israelis rather than Syrian Druze. So deliberately slaughtering a group of non-Jewish youngsters in the Golan Heights in order to help provoke and justify assassinations leading to a regional war with Iran and Hezbollah may be “cartoonishly evil” but it also seems to have been quite effective.

However, I think that in the longer-term the Israelis face a very serious problem. Each of their individual assassinations or terrorist attacks may succeed on the tactical level with the compliant American media carefully hiding many of the facts discussed above.

But over time, the enormous number of those very high-profile and daring assassinations of important foreign figures and even high-ranking leaders creates a pattern that most intelligent Americans will quietly recognize.

And at that point, such individuals may begin to consider all the top American political figures over the last couple of generations who were strongly opposed to crucial Israeli policies and then died by assassination or under other very strange circumstances, with President John F. Kennedy and his younger brother Robert being the most notable examples.

Stacking up a huge barrel of gunpowder is a dangerous thing to do when sparks might occasionally fly. And indeed, many people have pointed out that if and when the American public discovers that the Israeli Mossad was behind the 9/11 Attacks, a certain small Middle Eastern country will probably cease to exist along with nearly its entire population.

Related Reading:

 

 

By Ron Unz

Published by Unz.com

 

 

Republished by The 21st Century

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of 21cir.com

 

 

Sharing is caring!

One Reply to “THE [TERROR] STATE OF ISRAEL AS “CARTOONISHLY EVIL”?”

  1. It is likely Israel will destroy itself.
    I would be surprised if the area of Israel will still be habitable after 2031.

    Reply

Leave a Reply