The World Health Organization’s (WHO) General Assembly, the World Health Assembly (WHA), representing all 194 member states, will take place in Geneva, from 27 May to 1 June 2024.
During that crucial week, the WHA is expected to vote on the controversial “Pandemic Treaty” and the new revised International Health Regulation (IHR – last revision 2005).
With two thirds of the countries yes-vote, the treaty and the new IHR would be approved.
This would give the WHO, more precisely, the WHO’s Director General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, full power in matters of health and climate change over and above individual member countries health sovereignty.
Yes, climate change too, because climate change (the hoax) is pretended to also be responsible largely for human and animal health. This approval would be creating a One World Health — in, maybe soon to come, a One World Government.
They are both on top of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) and the UN’s agendas. The WEF/ UN alliance signed in June 2019, is officially to ‘accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’, which is equivalent to the WEF’s Great Reset, that ends in “You will own nothing but will be happy”.
Dr. Tedros was put into this WHO Director General (DG) position by Bill Gates, one of the WHO’s largest donors. The WHA just rubber-stamped Tedros into the WHO-DG position. Mr. Tedros is pursued for criminal activities in his home country, Ethiopia.
Funding for UN agencies’ budgets usually comes from member countries set contributions.
The case of WHO is quite different. WHO is funded up to 87% (the precise percentage depends on the year) by the private sector, of which Big Pharma, including the infamous NGO, GAVI – the “Vaccination Association”, with their offices just across the drive-way from WHO – and other interest groups, like Big-Tech, Big-Finance and Bill Gates and more.
Therefore, WHO, created in 1948 as a Rockefeller initiative is not a real UN agency. Gates, Rockefeller, Rothschild foundations are known for their eugenist agendas. They are supporting WHO.
According to Article 55 of the WHO’s very IHR, the final text to be voted on (Pandemic Treaty and revised IHR) should have been distributed to all member countries 4 months ahead of the WHA, i.e. on 27 January 2024. That did not happen. As of today, no official distribution of the final texts has taken place.
Still, the fear is that despite this WHO Constitutional shortcoming the vote will take place, even if muddled through behind closed doors, as has happened in the past, in particular during the most secretive negotiations for these two technocratic and world-dictatorial agreements.
It is said, unwilling country representatives (in most cases they are countries’ respective Health Ministers), maybe coerced, or exchanged for more willing participants.
The proposed amendments (Pandemic Treaty and IHR) among other threats to public freedom, stand to:
- Require surveillance of online information and censorship of information deemed “misinformation.”
- Require health documents that could be used to restrict access and travel.
- Force extreme lockdown measures.
- Allow the WHO to declare a “public health emergency of international concern” at will.
According to a “Global Health Policy” article, published on 1 April 2024, there is a possibility that the vote will be “postponed” – or “indefinitely deferred” – or set up for new negotiations, due to potentially insufficient votes. This is what they say:
“What are possible outcomes of the agreement negotiations?”
“WHO member states are expected to vote on the final text of the agreement during the WHA meeting this year, which starts on May 27, 2024. It is also possible that before then, member states decide to delay the vote to allow for more negotiating time. They may also choose to halt the process temporarily or permanently if sufficient agreement cannot be reached. If member states vote in favor, the agreement would be adopted as one of several different types of international legal agreements allowed under the WHO Constitution. Which form it takes is the subject of ongoing negotiations at the International Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), but possibilities include a “treaty”, a “regulation” or a “resolution” / ”decision,” each of which has specific characteristics and implications.”
For full article see this https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/issue-brief/the-pandemic-agreement-what-it-is-what-it-isnt-and-what-it-could-mean-for-the-u-s/ .
Dr. Meryl Nass, who has been thoroughly following the WHO “Pandemic Treaty / IHR” negotiating process, and founder and President of “Door to Freedom”, explains in a 16-min Youtube, Why the WHO’s New Plan Should Worry Everyone. See this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nvzaHKuAXA
Technocracy News further explains the wider implications of the new WHO treaty and IHR agreements, if they were to be approved. See this https://www.technocracy.news/whos-pandemic-treaty-technocrats-planning-on-total-control-of-everything/ .
———-
Just in – on a more positive outlook, Dr. Meryl Nass, explains that according to latest accounts 22 Attorneys General in the US have told Joe Biden that the WHO will not be making public policy in their States.
Simultaneously, US Senators Drop another Bombshell on the World Health Organization. In a shocking but positively surprising turn of events, all Republican senators (49), led by Senator Ron Johnson, have formally urged President Joe Biden to withdraw his support in expanding the WHO’s pandemic authority. For more on Senator Ron Johnson, see this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Johnson .
———-
Given these last-minute new circumstances and turns of events – it is possible that WHO / WHA will decide not to vote in their end-May 2024 Assembly, but to bring the new documents – Pandemic Treaty and revised IHR – to the UN General Assembly (UNGA) in September 2024.
What would happen there is uncertain. Even if the UNGA might vote for the new sovereignty-killing agreements, the vote might have to go to the UN Security Council (UNSC), where there is a chance that at least one of the veto countries might vote against it.
However, it is too soon to declare “victory”. The defeat of the planned WHO health tyranny – One Health Order – is not yet certain. For sure, the fight is far from over. But as the public at large is gaining more insight and awakening due to these recent events, hopes are that this Globalist agenda item in the Globalist’s plan to subdue the world into a One World Government under a One Health System – may be overturned.
It is still a Warning – but also a Big Hope. Collective Hope may have a tremendous impact on world events.
Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020). Peter is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also a non-resident Senior Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing.
Published by The 21st Century
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of 21cir.com